Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company v. Ice Freight Limited Liability Company
| Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company |
| Ice Freight Limited Liability Company |
| 1:2018cv05187 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ruben Castillo |
| Contract: Other |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo:Plaintiff's agreed motion to dismiss as settled #6 is granted. It is hereby ordered that this cause is dismissed as settled, compromised and adjourned. (rao, ) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Dismissal Order by Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company to Dismiss pursuant to Settlement (Gertler, Steven) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company for settlement Dismissal Order (Gertler, Steven) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (tt, ) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Srdjan Jovcic on 7/30/18 by Plaintiff Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company., CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Waiver of service due by 8/29/2018. (Gertler, Steven) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company by Steven Dale Gertler (Gertler, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gertler, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14758233. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint Exhibits)(Gertler, Steven) Docket Text Modified by Clerks Office (ew, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company v. Ice Freight Limited Liability Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ice Freight Limited Liability Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Steven Dale Gertler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
