Perez v. Martinez et al
Plaintiff: Araceli Perez
Defendant: Guillermo Martinez and G & Kevin Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv05232
Filed: July 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Araceli Perez as to G & Kevin Inc. on 9/7/2018, answer due 9/28/2018. (Sanchez, Jorge)
August 24, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 11/19/2018 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) report re MIDP due 11/14/2018. The report must comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg)
August 1, 2018 Filing 5 Exhibit 1 to Complaint - Consent to sue form by Araceli Perez (Sanchez, Jorge)
August 1, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mc, )
August 1, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (kb, )
August 1, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants G & Kevin Inc., Guillermo Martinez (jn, )
July 31, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Araceli Perez by Jorge Sanchez (Sanchez, Jorge)
July 31, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanchez, Jorge)
July 31, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Araceli Perez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14765507.(Sanchez, Jorge)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Martinez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guillermo Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G & Kevin Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Araceli Perez
Represented By: Jorge Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?