Ray v. City of Chicago et al
Plaintiff: Howard Ray, Sr.
Defendant: John Doe 1-4 and City of Chicago
Case Number: 1:2018cv05283
Filed: August 2, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Referring Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion by Nikoleta Lamprinakos for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #18 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 10/4/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
September 27, 2018 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #18 (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
September 27, 2018 Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant City of Chicago (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
September 26, 2018 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Status hearing held on 9/26/2018. Motion for extension of time to answer #15 is granted and the 9/27/2018 hearing date is vacated. Motion to dismiss is to be filed by 9/27/2018 and noticed for the next status hearing set for 10/4/2018 at 9:30 a.m. (pjg, )
September 24, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Nikoleta Lamprinakos for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #15 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/27/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
September 24, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Plead (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
August 20, 2018 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Defendant City of Chicago's motion for extension of time is granted #9 . Due date for response to complaint is set for 9/24/2018. The case is set for a status hearing before Judge Kennelly on 9/26/2018 at 9:30 AM. Plaintiff and counsel for defendant are directed to appear at that time. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
August 17, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Correction regarding #12 . (jk, )
August 17, 2018 Filing 12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly for all further proceedings. Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Executive Committee on 08/17/2018. (jk, ) Modified on 8/17/2018 (jk, ).
August 17, 2018 MIDP NOTICE: This case has been reassigned to a judge that is not participating in the MIDP Program therefore, this case is no longer part of MIDP Program. (jk, )
August 16, 2018 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Hailey Marie Golds (Golds, Hailey)
August 16, 2018 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Stephen Richard Miller (Miller, Stephen)
August 16, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Nikoleta Lamprinakos for presentment of extension of time #8 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 8/23/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
August 16, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
August 16, 2018 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Nikoleta Lamprinakos (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta)
August 2, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, )
August 2, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City of Chicago. (kp, )
August 2, 2018 Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Howard Ray, Sr. (kp, )
August 2, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (kp, )
August 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and no copies filed by Howard Ray, Sr; Jury Demand. (kp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ray v. City of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Ray, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1-4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Represented By: Hailey Marie Golds
Represented By: Stephen Richard Miller
Represented By: Nikoleta Lamprinakos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?