Nartey v. Franciscan Health hospital
| Isabella Nartey |
| Franciscan Health hospital |
| 1:2018cv05327 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 COMPLAINT filed by Isabella Nartey; Jury Demand. (tt, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Status hearing held on Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 on 9/24/2018. The application #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff to send the court the paperwork authorizing Ms. Nartey and her sister to represent the estate of their mother by Thursday, 9/27/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Case called for a status on Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 on 9/12/2018. Plaintiff did not appear. The matter is entered and continued to 9/24/2018 at 9:30 a.m. If Plaintiff does not appear in court at the next status or contact the court, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Status hearing on Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is set for 9/12/2018 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Isabella Nartey. (yap, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Isabella Nartey for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (yap, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (yap, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Isabella Nartey. (Attachment). (yap, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nartey v. Franciscan Health hospital | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Franciscan Health hospital | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Isabella Nartey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
