Coyote Logistics, LLC v. Sky Star Transport LLC
| Coyote Logistics, LLC |
| Sky Star Transport LLC |
| 1:2018cv05367 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Joel H. Steiner for presentment of motion for default judgment #8 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/16/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Steiner, Joel) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Coyote Logistics, LLC for default judgment as to Defendant Sky Star Transport LLC (Attachments: #1 Affidavit aff chris jordan, #2 Exhibit Ex 1-4 aff Chris Jordan)(Steiner, Joel) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 10/11/2018. Status hearing set for 10/16/2018 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/15/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Coyote Logistics, LLC as to Sky Star Transport LLC on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Steiner, Joel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (dlc, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Coyote Logistics, LLC by Paul Anthony Gajewski (Gajewski, Paul) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Coyote Logistics, LLC by Joel H. Steiner (Steiner, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Steiner, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Coyote Logistics, LLC; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14790194.(Steiner, Joel) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Sky Star Transport LLC (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coyote Logistics, LLC v. Sky Star Transport LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sky Star Transport LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Coyote Logistics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Paul Anthony Gajewski |
| Represented By: | Joel H. Steiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
