Wright v. Art Logistics, Inc. et al
| Brian Wright |
| Arkadiusz Gruszka and Art Logistics, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv05416 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Motion for extension of time to answer #9 is granted. The time for Defendants to respond to the complaint is extended to 11/7/2018. Motion hearing set for 10/11/2018 #10 is stricken. Status hearing set for 10/23/2018 #6 is stricken. MIDP disclosures shall be served by 12/7/2018. The parties shall file a joint status report by 12/11/2018. Initial status hearing set for 12/18/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Stephanie Melissa Gomberg Dinkel for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Gary Feinerman on 10/11/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Dinkel, Stephanie) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendants Art Logistics, Inc., Arkadiusz Gruszka for extension of time to file answer or to otherwise plead (UNOPPOSED) (Dinkel, Stephanie) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Art Logistics, Inc., Arkadiusz Gruszka by Renee L. Koehler (Koehler, Renee) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Art Logistics, Inc., Arkadiusz Gruszka by Stephanie Melissa Gomberg Dinkel (Dinkel, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: The docket does not reflect that summonses have been issued, let alone served, and there is no indication that Defendants have waived service. The status hearing set for 9/11/2018 #5 is stricken and re-set for 10/23/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is reminded of the requirements of Civil Rule 4(m).Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 9/11/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to art logistics, inc. on August 9 2018 by Plaintiff Brian Wright. Waiver of service due by 9/10/2018. (Kreitman, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to ARKADIUSZ GRUSZKA on August 9 2018 by Plaintiff Brian Wright. Waiver of service due by 9/10/2018. (Kreitman, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Brian Wright; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14802499. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kreitman, Nicholas) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
