Vasquez et al v. Limanowski et al
J. Carmen Casillas, Daniel Mendoza, Jose Pedraza, Rafael Sandrin and Ruben Vasquez |
Mid-America Tree and Landscape, Inc. and Joseph Limanowski |
1:2018cv05420 |
August 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Edmond E Chang |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the agreed extension motion #7 to answer, the motion does not actually include the good-faith certification that the MID Standing Order envisions to warrant a 30-day extension on the answer deadline. Having said that, because the defense has provided documents to promote settlement negotiations, the Court will extend the answer deadline to 11/05/2018 (which in turn will put the MID disclosures deadline at 12/05/2018). The status hearing of 09/20/2018 is reset to 11/06/2018 at 8:30 a.m., with the strong encouragement that the parties advance the negotiations promptly. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint Initial, filed by Plaintiffs J. Carmen Casillas, Daniel Mendoza, Jose Pedraza, Rafael Sandrin, Ruben Vasquez. (Sanchez, Jorge) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Mark Anthony Spognardi for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/20/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Spognardi, Mark) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Mid-America Tree and Landscape, Inc. for extension of time to file answer joint agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Spognardi, Mark) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mid-America Tree and Landscape, Inc. by Mark Anthony Spognardi (Spognardi, Mark) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Joseph Limanowski, Mid-America Tree and Landscape, Inc. (acm) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Initial status hearing set for 09/20/2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs J. Carmen Casillas, Daniel Mendoza, Jose Pedraza, Rafael Sandrin, Ruben Vasquez by Jorge Sanchez (Sanchez, Jorge) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanchez, Jorge) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ruben Vasquez, J. Carmen Casillas, Rafael Sandrin, Jose Pedraza, Daniel Mendoza; J. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14803000. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consents to sue)(Sanchez, Jorge) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.