Allied World Specialty Insurance Company v. Evelyn Flores et al
Allied World Specialty Insurance Company |
Armco, LLC and Evelyn Flores |
1:2018cv05445 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Gary Feinerman |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The docket does not reflect that summonses have been issued, let alone served. Status hearing set for 9/25/2018 #9 is stricken and re-set for 10/29/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is reminded of the requirements and procedures of Civil Rule 4(m).Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The jurisdictional addendum #8 establishes, at least for pleading purposes, that the parties are completely diverse. The Clerk is directed to add Evelyn Flores to the caption as a party defendant. Status hearing set for 9/6/2018 #6 is stricken and re-set for 9/25/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 8 Jurisdictional Addendum by Allied World Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Skoglund Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Skoglund, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lf, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:To properly allege the citizenship of Defendant Armco, LLC, the complaint must identify its members and the citizenship of each member. See Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 533-34 (7th Cir. 2007); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). By 8/27/2018, Plaintiff shall file a Jurisdictional Addendum providing that information. Failure to do so will result in dismissal for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Status hearing set for 9/6/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Allied World Specialty Insurance Company by Michael T Skoglund (Skoglund, Michael) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Allied World Specialty Insurance Company by Ommid Charles Farashahi (Farashahi, Ommid) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Rocap, Abigail) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Allied World Specialty Insurance Company by Abigail E Rocap (Rocap, Abigail) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Allied World Specialty Insurance Company; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14808442. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rocap, Abigail) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.