Mendez et al v. The City of Chicago
| Peter Mendez, Hester Mendez, Jack Mendez and Gilbert Mendez |
| The City of Chicago |
| 1:2018cv05560 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STATUS Report PLAINTIFFS' by Gilbert Mendez, Hester Mendez (Hofeld, Al)
|
|
Filing 13
AMENDED complaint by Hester Mendez, Gilbert Mendez against All Defendants (Hofeld, Al)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Jessica L Griff (Griff, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 11
Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Gilbert Mendez, Hester Mendez (Hofeld, Al)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendant's motion #8 for extension of time until 10/5/18 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' complaint is granted. No appearance is required on the motion. Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Motion by Gregory M. Beck for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 9/5/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Beck, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by Defendant The City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead - UNOPPOSED (Beck, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Gregory M. Beck (Beck, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Initial status hearing set for 10/16/18 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, )
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hester Mendez, Gilbert Mendez as to The City of Chicago on 8/15/2018, answer due 9/5/2018. (Hofeld, Al) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 8/16/2018 (jh, ).
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Gilbert Mendez, Hester Mendez by Al Hofeld, Jr. (Hofeld, Al) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 8/16/2018 (jh, ).
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hofeld, Al)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Hester Mendez, Gilbert Mendez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14825058. (Hofeld, Al) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 8/16/2018 (jh, ).
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The City of Chicago (jn, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (yt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
