Marcelo v. Otis Elevator Company
Marc Marcelo |
Otis Elevator Company |
1:2018cv05759 |
August 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures by Sean M Houlihan on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Houlihan, Sean) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (McElmury, Brittany) |
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion to withdraw as attorney #19 is granted. Alexander M. Wilder is granted leave to withdraw as counsel. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion by Brittany Lynn McElmury for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney #19 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/23/2018 at 09:00 AM. (McElmury, Brittany) |
Filing 19 MOTION by Attorney Alexander M. Wilder to withdraw as attorney for Otis Elevator Company. (McElmury, Brittany) |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Marcelo by Sean M Houlihan (Houlihan, Sean) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Marc Marcelo to answer to complaint #11 affirmative defenses (Houlihan, Sean) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Rouse, Steven) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE Certification of Attorney regarding Discovery Obligations under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (McElmury, Brittany) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Otis Elevator Company by Brittany Lynn McElmury (McElmury, Brittany) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The status hearing set for 10/18/18 is reset to 10/31/18 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Otis Elevator Company re answer to complaint #11 (Rouse, Steven) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Otis Elevator Company(Rouse, Steven) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 10/18/18 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 9 MAILED corrected Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (yap, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Correction regarding mailed notice #6 . (yap, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
Filing 6 MAILED Removal letter to counsel of record. (yap, ) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Otis Elevator Company Corporate Disclosure (Wilder, Alexander) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Otis Elevator Company by Steven Porter Rouse (Rouse, Steven) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Otis Elevator Company by Alexander Mark Wilder (Wilder, Alexander) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wilder, Alexander) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois - Law Division, case number (2018L007077) filed by Otis Elevator Company Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14862091. (Wilder, Alexander) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marcelo v. Otis Elevator Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company | |
Represented By: | Alexander Mark Wilder |
Represented By: | Steven Porter Rouse |
Represented By: | Brittany Lynn McElmury |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marc Marcelo | |
Represented By: | Sean M Houlihan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.