Schmitt v. Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125
| Dolores Schmitt |
| Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125 |
| 1:2018cv05840 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 10/31/18 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Dolores Schmitt. All Defendants. (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125 by Philip H Gerner, III (Gerner, Philip) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125 by Kevin Paul Noll (Noll, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dolores Schmitt by Bradley Edwin Faber (Faber, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dolores Schmitt by Keith L. Hunt (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT 18 cv 5840 filed by Dolores Schmitt; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14873943. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Hunt, Keith) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (kb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schmitt v. Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dolores Schmitt | |
| Represented By: | Keith L. Hunt |
| Represented By: | Bradley Edwin Faber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adlai E. Stevenson High School District 125 | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Paul Noll |
| Represented By: | Philip H Gerner, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
