Ritter v. Canon USA, Inc.
| James R. Ritter |
| Canon USA, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv05899 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by James R. Ritter. Canon USA, Inc. waiver sent on 9/5/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (Heitz, Russell) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorneys Claire Smith and Melissa Raphan's Motions to appear pro hac vice #8 and #9 are granted. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-14975477. (Smith, Claire) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-14975380. (Raphan, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Canon USA, Inc. by Lauren F. Catlin (Catlin, Lauren) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Canon USA, Inc. by John Francis Grady (Grady, John) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 12/3/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 11/29/2018. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Canon USA, Inc. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff James R. Ritter by Russell John Heitz (Heitz, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Heitz, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James R. Ritter; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14882648.(Heitz, Russell) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ritter v. Canon USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Canon USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Francis Grady |
| Represented By: | Claire Smith |
| Represented By: | Melissa Raphan |
| Represented By: | Lauren F. Catlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James R. Ritter | |
| Represented By: | Russell John Heitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
