Larocco v. Andrews and Cox, P.C.
| Edward Larocco |
| Andrews and Cox, P.C. |
| 1:2018cv05999 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/25/18. Mailed notice(ca, ) |
| Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion hearing held on 10/25/18. Agreed motion for entry of a confidentiality order #20 is granted with the revisions ordered on the record. Counsel should submit a revised protective order and contact the courtroom deputy when they have done so.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Agreed motion for extension of time until November 5, 2018 to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint #19 is granted. The status hearing set for 10/25/18 is reset to 11/14/18 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 22 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by Edward Larocco (Kim, David) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Motion by Joseph D Kern for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #19 , motion for protective order #20 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/25/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 MOTION by Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. for protective order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Kim, David) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Hardy, Tiffany) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Agreed motion for extension of time until October 19, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint #12 is granted. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 13 Agreed NOTICE of Motion by Joseph D Kern for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #12 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/2/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. for extension of time to file response/reply as to complaint #1 (Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) (Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. by Joseph D Kern (Kern, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. by David M Schultz (Schultz, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward Larocco as to Andrews and Cox, P.C. on 9/7/2018, answer due 9/28/2018. (Hardy, Tiffany) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 10/25/18 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Andrews and Cox, P.C. d/b/a Bleecker Brodey & Andrews. (acm) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Edward Larocco by David See Kim (Kim, David) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Edward Larocco by Tiffany Nicole Hardy (Hardy, Tiffany) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Edward Larocco by Cathleen M. Combs (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Edward Larocco by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edward Larocco; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14899382. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Edelman, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Larocco v. Andrews and Cox, P.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Larocco | |
| Represented By: | Daniel A. Edelman |
| Represented By: | Tiffany Nicole Hardy |
| Represented By: | David See Kim |
| Represented By: | Cathleen M. Combs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrews and Cox, P.C. | |
| Represented By: | David M Schultz |
| Represented By: | Joseph D Kern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
