Krishnan v. Rush University Medical Center
| Partha Sarti Krishnan |
| Rush University Medical Center |
| 1:2018cv06088 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to and including 11/8/2018 to file responsive pleading #13 is granted. Initial status hearing is reset to 11/20/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Notice of motion date of 10/9/2018 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Jane M. McFetridge for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #13 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 10/9/2018 at 09:15 AM. (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Rush University Medical Center for extension of time to file answer (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rush University Medical Center by Julia Pearce Argentieri (Argentieri, Julia) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rush University Medical Center by Jane M. McFetridge (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Motion of Alex J. Levin for leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff #8 is granted. Notice of motion date of 10/2/2018 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff NOTICE of Motion by Alex Jacob Levin for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney #8 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 10/2/2018 at 09:15 AM. (Levin, Alex) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Attorney Alex J. Levin to withdraw as attorney for Partha Sarti Krishnan. No party information provided (Levin, Alex) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 10/19/2018 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Partha Sarti Krishnan as to Rush University Medical Center on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Levin, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Rush University Medical Center (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Partha Sarti Krishnan by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Partha Sarti Krishnan by Alex Jacob Levin (Levin, Alex) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Partha Sarti Krishnan by David B. Levin (Levin, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Partha Sarti Krishnan; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14914890. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Levin, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Krishnan v. Rush University Medical Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Partha Sarti Krishnan | |
| Represented By: | Alex Jacob Levin |
| Represented By: | David B. Levin |
| Represented By: | Todd M Friedman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rush University Medical Center | |
| Represented By: | Julia Pearce Argentieri |
| Represented By: | Jane M. McFetridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
