Green v. Pfister et al
| Ras Green |
| Officer Bianton, Officer Edwards, Doctor OBaisi and Randy Pfister |
| 1:2018cv06100 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Ras Green for attorney representation (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 10/23/18, and a copy of Order dated 8/19/16 in Case No. 16 C 7515 to the trust fund officer at the Stateville Correctional Center. (aee, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued along with USM 285 form(s), certified copy of order dated 10/23/2018 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to defendant Randy Pfister via email. (aee, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 10/23/18, a Magistrate Judge Consent Form, and filing instructions to Plaintiff. (aee, ) |
| Filing 10 COMPLAINT filed by Ras Green (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #8 is granted. The court assesses an initial partial filing fee payment of $6.00. The trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement is directed to make monthly deductions from Plaintiff's trust fund account in accordance with this order. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order and a copy of the court's 8/19/16 order in Case No. 16 C 7515 to the trust fund officer at the Stateville Correctional Center. The Clerk shall also: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (2) issue summons for its service on Defendant Randy Pfister; (3) forward the USM 285 form Plaintiff submitted 5 to the U.S. Marshal; and (4) mail to Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and filing instructions for this Court. The Marshal is appointed to serve Pfister. Plaintiffs motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. The Defendants other than Pfister are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 10/23/2018. Mailed notice (aee, )
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ras Green for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (Envelope postmarked 09/28/18) (aee, ) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT by Ras Green. (Envelope postmarked 9/27/18) (aee, ) |
| MAILED a blank in forma pauperis application and a copy of order dated 9/7/2018 #6 to Plaintiff Ras Green (bg, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to pursue this litigation, he must submit a renewed in forma pauperis application that attaches a copy of his trust fund statement showing activity in his account for the six-month period immediately before he filed this suit. Alternatively, he may pay the full statutory filing fee of $400. His failure to comply by October 8, 2018 will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send a blank in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 9/7/2018. Mailed notice. (bg, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Ras Green for attorney representation. (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ras Green for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ras Green (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
