Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Ohio Wesleyan University
Compass Group USA, Inc. |
OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY |
1:2018cv06132 |
September 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed with prejudice. Status hearing of 11/14/2018 is vacated. Civil case terminated.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Compass Group USA, Inc. (Lipman, Matthew) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 11/14/2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (eaa, ) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Compass Group USA, Inc. (Lipman, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lipman, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Compass Group USA, Inc.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14920760.(Lipman, Matthew) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Ohio Wesleyan University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Compass Group USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew Lipman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.