Keck v. Gobstock LLC et al
| Michel keck |
| Charles Mellyn, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Gobstock LLC and Gloria Mellyn |
| 1:2018cv06193 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Settlement by Michel Keck (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION regarding summons returned executed #8 , summons returned executed #9 , summons returned executed #10 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend the Answering Deadline to November 15, 2018 (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Gobstock LLC, Charles Mellyn, Gloria Mellyn by Isaiah A. Fishman (Fishman, Isaiah) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michel Keck as to Gloria Mellyn on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michel Keck as to Charles Mellyn on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michel Keck as to Gobstock LLC on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (eaa, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 11/14/2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (eaa, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Gobstock LLC, Charles Mellyn, Gloria Mellyn (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Michel keck Copyright Form AO121 (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Michel keck (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michel keck by Mathew Higbee (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michel keck; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14929798. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Higbee, Mathew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
