Lentine et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Lentine and Shelly Lentine
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and FSB
Case Number: 1:2018cv06294
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Correction regarding docket entry #8 (pk, )
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 9/25/2018. Mailed notice. (pk, )
September 25, 2018 Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (pk, )
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 9/25/2018. Mailed notice. (pk, )
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 9/25/2018. Mailed notice. (pk, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (eaa, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (eaa, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Matthew Lentine. (eaa, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (eaa, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shelly Lentine, Matthew Lentine; no. (eaa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lentine et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Lentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelly Lentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?