Woods v. Hines V.A. Hospital Doctors et al
| J.R. DeVere Woods |
| Hines V.A. Hospital Doctors and Resident & Unknown Dentist |
| 1:2018cv06302 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 10/17/2018.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The 9/17/2018 order #6 denied Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application and stated that, if Plaintiff wished to proceed with this case, he had until 10/11/2018 to file a complete in forma pauperis application and provide the explanation requested in the order. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Status hearing set for 10/24/2018 #6 status. Enter judgment order. Civil case closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is #4 denied for failure to answer Question 2B. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he has until 10/11/2018 to file a complete in forma pauperis application. In addition, if Plaintiff continues to maintain that he has not received $200 in the past twelve months from any source, he must explain how he manages to feed, clothe, and shelter himself. Status hearing set for 10/24/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (eaa, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff J.R. DeVere Woods for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (eaa, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff J.R. DeVere Woods. (eaa, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (eaa, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by J.R. DeVere Woods. (Exhibits). (eaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
