Perry v. Vaga et al
| Lennie Perry |
| John Vaga and Attorney General for the State of Illinois |
| 1:2018cv06355 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The habeas corpus petition #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The five dollar filing fee is waived. Any pending motions are moot. Civil Case Terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/17/2018. Mailed notice. (pk, )
|
| Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings. Honorable Charles P. Kocoras no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/4/2018.(pk, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Lennie Perry for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (pk, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pk, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Lennie Perry against Attorney General for the State of Illinois, John Vaga. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 9/13/2018)(pk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
