Arab American Action Network v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Arab American Action Network |
Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
1:2018cv06528 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The Court grants Defendants' unopposed motion to extend the deadline to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint #12 to and including December 3, 2018. No appearance on the motion is necessary.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Jimmy Lorenzo Arce for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 11/27/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Arce, Jimmy) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation for extension of time to file answer Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Answer (Arce, Jimmy) |
Filing 11 DESIGNATION of Jimmy Lorenzo Arce as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (Arce, Jimmy) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing held on 11/13/18. The government reports that they are conducting a search for the records requested in the FOIA request and will file their answer on Monday. The Court will not set a MIDP deadline at this time. Status hearing set for 1/22/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 9 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT by Arab American Action Network (Van Dril, Hanan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arab American Action Network as to All Defendants., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arab American Action Network as to All Defendants on 10/3/2018, answer due 10/24/2018 (Van Dril, Hanan). (Docket text modified by the Clerk's office) Modified on 10/4/2018 (mc, ). |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE Certification form regarding MIDP (Van Dril, Hanan) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Initial status hearing set for 11/13/18 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arab American Action Network by Hanan Erikat Van Dril (Van Dril, Hanan) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arab American Action Network by Aaron Paul Wenzloff (Wenzloff, Aaron) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wenzloff, Aaron) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arab American Action Network. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14990778. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through I)(Wenzloff, Aaron) (Docket Text Modified by Clerks Office) (ew, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (daj, ) (Docket Text Modified by Clerks Office) (ew, ). |
SUMMONS Issued as to Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.