Chapman v. Day et al
| Sean Wayne Chapman |
| S. Day |
| 1:2018cv06676 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to either (1) submit signed and completed application that includes all relevant information regarding his income, as explained below; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. Failure to comply with this order by December 14, 2018, will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff is further notified that, although he has been released from custody, he owes the filing fee for this case and will be expected to pay it, if his income permits, in installments commensurate with his income or through trust fund account deductions if he is incarcerated again. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff. The Court defers a merits review of Plaintiff's complaint #1 until Plaintiff has resolved his fee status. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice to later renewal. If he wishes to do so, Plaintiff may make an in-person appointment with the U.S. District Court Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Self Help Attorney by selecting the "representing yourself" button on the Court's homepage (www.ilnd.uscourts.gov) and then following the instructions for making an appointment. Alternatively, Plaintiff may call (312) 435-5691. Plaintiff must promptly inform the Court of address changes, or this case may be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/19/2018. Mailed notice (smm)
|
| MAILED a copy of this order and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff Sean Wayne Chapman. (smm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Sean Wayne Chapman of Change of Address. (Case number not displayed on document). (Envelope postmark 10/22/18). (smm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Sean Wayne Chapman for attorney representation. (smm) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sean Wayne Chapman for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (Attachment). (smm) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Sean Wayne Chapman. (Envelope not postmarked). (smm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. Day et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: S. Day | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sean Wayne Chapman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
