Gomez v. Capital Manangement Services LPs
Felipe Gomez |
Capital Manangement Services LPs |
1:2018cv06763 |
October 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Gary Feinerman |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Capital Manangement Services LPs by Bradley R. Armstrong (Armstrong, Bradley) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Capital Manangement Services LPs by Stacie Elaine Barhorst (Barhorst, Stacie) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Capital Manangement Services LPs (ec, ) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff by Plaintiff Felipe Gomez (Gomez, Felipe) Modified on 11/9/2018 (kp, ). (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Because the docket does not reflect that summons has been issued, let alone served, the status hearing set for 11/13/2018 #4 is stricken and re-set for 12/17/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is reminded of the requirements of Civil Rule 4(m).Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 9 FIRST (REFILED - SEE DOC. #8 ) AMENDED complaint by Felipe Gomez against Capital Manangement Services LPs Per Leave of Court (Gomez, Felipe) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Correction regarding amended document #7 . (ew, ) |
Filing 7 AMENDED Complaint (Radzilowsky, Michael) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Felipe Gomez by Michael Radzilowsky (Radzilowsky, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 11/13/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (daj, ) |
MAILED the Standing Order and a Checklist to the Plaintiff, Felipe Gomez. (jh, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gomez, Felipe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Gomez v Capital Management Services LP filed by Felipe Gomez; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15032713.(Gomez, Felipe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gomez v. Capital Manangement Services LPs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Capital Manangement Services LPs | |
Represented By: | Bradley R. Armstrong |
Represented By: | Stacie Elaine Barhorst |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Felipe Gomez | |
Represented By: | Felipe N Gomez |
Represented By: | Michael Radzilowsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.