Campos v. ICS Collection Service, Inc.
Jacqueline Campos |
ICS Collection Service, Inc. |
1:2018cv06826 |
October 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to stipulation, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice with leave to move to reinstate on or before January 3, 2019. Absent a timely filed motion to reinstate or extend the time in which to reinstate this dismissal order will become final with prejudice on January 4, 2019 without further order of the Court. The December 19, 2018 status hearing is vacated.Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice With Leave to Reinstate (Agreed) (Wasieleski, Kristen) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Joint status report due by 12/14/2018. Status hearing set for 12/19/2018 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/16/2018:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant ICS Collection Service, Inc. (pj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jacqueline Campos by David Scott Klain (Klain, David) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jacqueline Campos by Kristen Carroll Wasieleski (Wasieleski, Kristen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jacqueline Campos; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15047221. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Call Log, #2 Exhibit B- Collection Letter, #3 Exhibit C-Email w/UIC, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wasieleski, Kristen) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Campos v. ICS Collection Service, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Campos | |
Represented By: | David Scott Klain |
Represented By: | Kristen Carroll Wasieleski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ICS Collection Service, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.