Dukes v. Berryhill
| Celia Dukes |
| Nancy Berryhill |
| 1:2018cv06901 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Michael T Mason |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Michael T. Mason:This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Mason. A certified copy of the administrative record shall be filed by 2/1/19. The Court will set a briefing schedule after the administrative record is filed. Mailed notice. (rbf, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Michael T. Mason pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/16/2018. (nsf, )
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the joint consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, the status hearing of 11/20/2018 with Judge Chang is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Flannery, Kathleen) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Kathleen Marie Flannery as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Flannery, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of financial indigency, Plaintiff's motion #1 to proceed in format pauperis is granted. The Court strongly encourages the parties to consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. An initial status hearing is set for 11/20/2018 at 9 a.m. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Celia Dukes by Amy B. Marinacci (Marinacci, Amy) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marinacci, Amy) |
| Filing 2 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Celia Dukes; (Marinacci, Amy) Modified on 10/16/2018 (aee, ). |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Celia Dukes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Marinacci, Amy) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 10/16/2018 (aee, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dukes v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Marie Flannery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Celia Dukes | |
| Represented By: | Amy B. Marinacci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
