Marcordes v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Charles R. Marcordes
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2018cv06949
Filed: October 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Michael T Mason
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2018 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Michael T. Mason:This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Mason. Plaintiff's opening brief shall be filed by 2/4/19. Defendant's response brief shall be filed by 3/19/19. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed by 4/2/19. The Court will issue a ruling by mail. Mailed notice. (rbf, )
November 19, 2018 Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Michael T. Mason for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1 Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/19/2018. (ek, )
November 19, 2018 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the joint consent to the magistrate judge, R. 7, the status hearing of 11/20/2018 with Judge Chang is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
November 19, 2018 Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Ling, Ernest)
November 19, 2018 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Ling, Ernest)
October 19, 2018 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, in light of financial indigency. The Court strongly encourages the parties to consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. An initial status hearing is set for 11/20/2018 at 9:30 a.m.Emailed notice (slb, )
October 17, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (ec, )
October 16, 2018 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Charles R. Marcordes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
October 16, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Charles R. Marcordes by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
October 16, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
October 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charles R. Marcordes; (Attachments: #1 AC Decision)(Schultz, Barry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcordes v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles R. Marcordes
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?