Collins v. I.C. System, Inc.
| Monique L Collins |
| I.C. System, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07044 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by I.C. System, Inc.(Golden, Dale) |
| Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiff Monique L Collins. (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Monique L Collins by Kristen Carroll Wasieleski (Wasieleski, Kristen) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Monique L Collins. I.C. System, Inc. waiver sent on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Joint status report due by 12/13/2018. Status hearing set for 12/18/2018 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/25/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant I.C. System, Inc. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Monique L Collins by David Scott Klain (Klain, David) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Monique L Collins by Geoffrey Bernard McCarrell (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Monique L Collins; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15085075. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Credit Report)(McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collins v. I.C. System, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: I.C. System, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dale Thomas Golden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monique L Collins | |
| Represented By: | David Scott Klain |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey Bernard McCarrell |
| Represented By: | Kristen Carroll Wasieleski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
