Aguilar v. City of Chicago et al
Matthew Aguilar |
Eric Duron, City of Chicago and Unknown Chicago Police Officers |
1:2018cv07098 |
October 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 unopposed NOTICE of Motion by Kathryn E Kohls for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #17 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/7/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Kohls, Kathryn) |
Filing 17 MOTION by Defendant Eric Duron for extension of time to file answer unopposed (Kohls, Kathryn) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Eric Duron by Kathryn E Kohls (Kohls, Kathryn) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Defendant City of Chicago's motion to stay #13 is denied as moot.Motion hearing held on 12/13/2018.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Stephanie Amanda Sotomayor for presentment of motion to stay #13 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/13/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago to stay (Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Cheryl Lynne Friedman (Friedman, Cheryl) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Stephanie Amanda Sotomayor (Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Devlin Joseph Schoop (Schoop, Devlin) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Aguilar as to Eric Duron on 11/9/2018, answer due 11/30/2018. (Bakos, Abby) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Aguilar as to City of Chicago on 11/9/2018, answer due 11/30/2018. (Bakos, Abby) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Joint status report due by 1/4/2019. Status hearing set for 1/8/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/9/2018:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Chicago, and Eric Duron. (acm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Aguilar by Brendan Shiller (Shiller, Brendan) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Aguilar by Mary Johanna Grieb (Grieb, Mary) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Aguilar by Abby Dana Bakos (Bakos, Abby) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bakos, Abby) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Aguilar; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15095318.(Bakos, Abby) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.