Perez v. Village of Maywood et al
| Stacy Perez |
| David Neal, Valdimir Talley, Village Attorney's Klein, Thorpe & Jenkins, Brandon Hawkins, Ordinance Enforcement Department, Michael Frommert, Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board, Maywood Police Department, Sean Early, Melissa Soso, Judge Shoffner, Office of Administrative Hearings, Eric Dent, Connie Thompson, Charlotte Powell, Sean Brady, Pete Schleich, Ememobong Ikaffia, Daniel Groth, Theodore Yancy, Maybrook Court House, Donna Marquette, Elijah Willis, Village of Maywood, Department of Community Developmen, Venus Meadows, Michael Jurusik, Allen Wall and Michael Marrs |
| 1:2018cv07281 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Correction regarding #12 . (gcy, ) |
| Filing 12 ENTERED IN ERROR. |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 1/16/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED complaint by Stacy Perez against Eric Dent, Sean Early, Michael Frommert, Daniel Groth, Brandon Hawkins, Ememobong Ikaffia, Donna Marquette, Maybrook Court House, Maywood Police Department, Venus Meadows, David Neal, Charlotte Powell, Pete Schleich, Melissa Soso, Valdimir Talley, Connie Thompson, Village Attorney's Klein, Thorpe & Jenkins, Village of Maywood, Elijah Willis, Theodore Yancy, Allen Wall, Michael Jurusik, Michael Marrs. (ew, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued, 26 Original with certified copy of Order dated 11/7/18 with complaint as to Defendants Sean Brady, Eric Dent, Department of Community Developmen, Sean Early, Michael Frommert, Daniel Groth, Brandon Hawkins, Ememobong Ikaffia, Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board, Donna Marquette, Maybrook Court House, Maywood Police Department, Venus Meadows, David Neal, Office of Administrative Hearings, Ordinance Enforcement Department, Charlotte Powell, Pete Schleich, Judge Shoffner, Melissa Soso, Valdimir Talley, Connie Thompson, Village Attorney's Klein, Thorpe & Jenkins, Village of Maywood, Elijah Willis, Theodore Yancy, to U.S. Marshal for service via email. (gcy, ) |
| MAILED copy of Order dated 11/7/18 w/ 26 USM-285 forms to Stacy Perez. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Stacy Perez; Jury Demand. (gcy, ) Text Modified on 11/8/2018 (gcy, ). |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Plaintiff has filed a complaint #1 and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 . Plaintiff's IFP application demonstrates that she cannot prepay the filing fee, and the application is thus granted. Additionally, the Court has conducted an initial review of Plaintiff's complaint and determined that it satisfies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). See Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint on Defendants; and (3) mail Plaintiff a copy of this order, as well as 26 blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve Defendant but will not attempt service until Plaintiff returns completed USM-285 service forms. Plaintiff must return the completed USM-285 forms to the Clerk of Court by 12/7/18. Her failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of prosecution. An initial status hearing is set for 1/9/19 at 9:00 a.m.. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice given the early stage of the case and Plaintiff's apparent ability to present her claims logically and coherently. See Romanelli v. Suliene, 615 F.3d 847, 852 (7th Cir. 2010) (approving of district court's decision not to recruit counsel where the case was still in its "infancy" and none of the defendants had filed an answer). Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ew, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Stacy Perez for attorney representation; Exhibit. (ew, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Stacy Perez for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ew, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Stacy Perez. (ew, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ew, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Stacy Perez. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
