Williams v. Pactiv Corp. et al
| Vincent Williams |
| Elite Staffing, Inc. and Pactiv Corp. |
| 1:2018cv07298 |
| November 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed as to Elite Staffing, Inc. Waiver sent on 12/19/2018, answer due 2/19/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:This case is set for an initial status conference on 3/5/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status conferences, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==], and to submit the required initial status report no later than 2/26/19. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by US Marshal Office as to Elite Staffing, Inc. waiver sent on 12/18/2018, answer due 2/19/2019. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by US Marshal's Office as to Pactiv Corp. waiver sent on 11/26/2018, answer due 1/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(nsf, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued along with USM 285 form(s), certified copy of order dated 11/2/2018 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to defendant Elite Staffing, Inc., Pactiv Corp. via email. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Vincent Williams; Jury Demand. (Exhibits)(nsf, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The plaintiff may proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee. The United States Marshals Service is appointed to serve defendants. The Clerk shall issue summonses for service of the complaint by the U.S. Marshal on the defendants. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff two blank USM-285 forms. The U.S. Marshal will not attempt service on Defendants unless and until the required forms are received from Plaintiff. Plaintiff must therefore complete and return the forms to the U.S. Marshal within thirty days of the date of this order. The U.S. Marshal is directed to make all reasonable efforts to serve Defendants.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Vincent Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (sxb, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Vincent Williams (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Vincent Williams (Exhibits) (sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
