Rodriguez et al v. Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.,
Plaintiff: Yamilet Rodriguez and Aerolitoral S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Aeromexico Connect
Defendant: Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico and Aerovias de Mexico, S.A de C.V.
Case Number: 1:2018cv07322
Filed: November 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Referring Judge: Harry D Leinenweber
Nature of Suit: Airplane
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yamilet Rodriguez by Richard Francis Burke, Jr (Burke, Richard)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the reassignment order dated, 11/20/2018, the hearing before Judge Blakey set for 12/20/2018, is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On the Court's own motion, the status hearing previously set for 12/20/2018 at 9:45 a.m. is reset for 12/20/2018 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE of Correction regarding #14 , #15 , #16 , #17 , #18 . (aee, )
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 11/30/2018 (aee, ).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 11/30/2018 (aee, ).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 11/30/2018 (aee, ).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 11/30/2018 (aee, ).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 11/30/2018 (aee, ).
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber for all further proceedings Pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/20/18. (aee, )
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order MIDP NOTICE: This case has been reassigned to a judge that is not participating in the MIDP Program therefore, this case is no longer part of MIDP Program. (aee, )
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Yamilet Rodriguez Response to Affirmative Defenses (Casciato, Jack)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yamilet Rodriguez by Jack Joseph Casciato (Casciato, Jack)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Courts inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP%20Standing%20Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 12/20/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 12/10/2018, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Aerovias de Mexico, S.A de C.V. and Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 Disclosure Statement (Walker, Richard)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1 Notice by Aerovias de Mexico, S.A de C.V.(Walker, Richard)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to Attorney of Record. (gcy, )
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, )
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico by Telly Andrews (Andrews, Telly)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Pursuant to Local Rule 40.4 by Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico (Walker, Richard)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico by Richard Alan Walker (Walker, Richard)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Walker, Richard)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2018 L 011560) filed by Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15137351. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons to Aerovias de Mexico, S.A.)(Walker, Richard)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez et al v. Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yamilet Rodriguez
Represented By: Richard Francis Burke, Jr.
Represented By: Jack Joseph Casciato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aerolitoral S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Aeromexico Connect
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico
Represented By: Telly Andrews
Represented By: Richard Alan Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerovias de Mexico, S.A de C.V.
Represented By: Telly Andrews
Represented By: Richard Alan Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?