Finkl v. DuPage Aerospace Corporation
James B Finkl |
DuPage Aerospace Corporation |
EMERY AIR, INC. |
1:2018cv07332 |
November 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Elaine E Bucklo |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS Issued as to Third Party Defendant EMERY AIR, INC. (yt) |
Filing 17 THIRD party complaint by DuPage Aerospace Corporation against EMERY AIR, INC. .(Banovetz, Mark) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Katherine Frances Letcher (Letcher, Katherine) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Daniel Richard Formeller (Formeller, Daniel) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Mark Thomas Banovetz (Banovetz, Mark) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Ashley S. Koda (Koda, Ashley) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Michael Sweeney McGrory (McGrory, Michael) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by DuPage Aerospace Corporation re answer to complaint #10 Notice of Filing for the Answer to the Complaint (Farkas, Alan) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by DuPage Aerospace Corporation(Farkas, Alan) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Brandt Randall Madsen (Madsen, Brandt) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation by Alan L. Farkas (Farkas, Alan) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James B. Finkl as to DuPage Aerospace Corporation on 11/6/2018, answer due 11/27/2018. (Durkin, Sandra) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 11/30/2018 (jh, ). |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 2/7/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) report re MIDP due 2/4/2019. The report must comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff James B Finkl by Sandra Jane Durkin (Durkin, Sandra) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff James B Finkl by James A. Morsch (Morsch, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Morsch, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James B Finkl; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15140222.(Morsch, James) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant DuPage Aerospace Corporation (ec, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.