Hudson v. Dept. of Revenue and Finance et al
| George W. Hudson, Jr. |
| Meyer Cherry and Associates, Dept. of Revenue and Finance, Dept. of Streets and Sanitations, St. Louis Pic-A-Part Auto and Corporation Counsel City of Chicago |
| 1:2018cv07333 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application #14 is granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), the complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice because it does not state a discernible federal claim against any of the defendants and because the court would relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims (there is no diversity of citizenship) pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c)(3) given the stage of the case. Plaintiff has until 1/17/2019 to submit an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does so, the amended complaint must describe precisely what each defendant is alleged to have done to Plaintiff and how Plaintiff was injured. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal with prejudice of this suit. The 1/17/2019 status hearing #13 is stricken and re-set to 2/13/2019 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Correction regarding #16 (jjr, ) |
| Filing 16 ENTERED in Error (jjr, ) Modified on 12/20/2018 (jjr, ). |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion for Reconsideration by George W. Hudson, Jr. (jh, ) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #11 is denied. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is materially incomplete in one respect and appears false in another. First, Plaintiff's response to Question 2.B does not estimate his monthly wages from Uber. Second, Plaintiff's response to Question 4.F states that he received less than $200 in public assistance over the past twelve months, yet his affidavit of indigency (Dkt. 12 at 2) avers that he receives "General Assistance, SNAP benefits for food, [and] MIAP a County based program that pays for inpatient hospital services." If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this suit, he must either file a proper in forma pauperis application or pay the $400.00 filing fee by 1/4/2019. Motion hearing set for 12/10/2018 #12 is stricken. Status hearing set for 12/17/2018 #10 is stricken and re-set for 1/17/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by George W. Hudson, Jr for presentment of application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #11 before Honorable Gary Feinerman on 12/7/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Exhibit) (bg, ) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (bg, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied without prejudice for failure to answer Question 2B. Plaintiff has until 12/7/2018 to file a renewed in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff files such an application, he should explain how he is able to clothe, feed, and shelter himself despite receiving no money during the last twelve months. If Plaintiff fails to comply, this case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Status hearing set for 12/17/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman for all further proceedings puruant to 28 USC 294(b). Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/6/2018.(jh, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 5 copies by George W. Hudson, Jr. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
