Baker vs. Santander Consumer USA et al
Santander Consumer USA, Collier Black, Derrick WS Baker and Derrick W Baker |
1:2018cv07365 |
November 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Court's own initiative, the status hearing time of 1:30 p.m. is reset to 3 p.m. on the same date, 01/23/2019. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing held. Monte Hurst, counsel for Defendant Santander Consumer USA appeared by phone and reported that the corporate Defendant will be returning the waiver of service of summons. The Court directed defense counsel to inquire into whether Defendant Collier Black still works for the corporate Defendant, and to confer with Plaintiff. The ultimate goal is to avoid needless formal service (with its attendant cost-shifting), though ultimately Defendant Black may decide whether he will waive or not. Defense counsel also noted that Defendant believes there is an enforceable arbitration agreement. That can be raised by pleading or motion when service is accomplished and the answer deadline is in place. Status hearing set for 01/23/2019 at 1:30 p.m. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 6 STATUS Report by Derrick W Baker (Blanchard, Terri) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing set for 12/17/2018 at 8:45 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Derrick WS Baker by Terri J. Blanchard (Blanchard, Terri) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blanchard, Terri) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Derrick WS Baker; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15147962. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Blanchard, Terri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.