CIT Bank N.A. v. Genelle Treadwell et al
| CIT Bank N.A. |
| Genelle Treadwell, United States of America c/o HUD, Second City Construction Co., Inc and Gilbert Treadwell |
| 1:2018cv07366 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Harry D Leinenweber |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Katharine Flynn Lessaris [AMENDED] (Lessaris, Katharine) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Jena M. Valdetero [AMENDED] (Valdetero, Jena) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Katharine Flynn Lessaris (Lessaris, Katharine) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Jena M. Valdetero (Valdetero, Jena) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Government's motions to reassign case #4 and for extension of time to answer #5 are withdrawn. Government's motion to withdraw motions #8 is granted. The 11/20/2018 notice motion date before Judge Durkin is stricken. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber for all further proceedings. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/13/18. (smm) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Counter Defendant United States of America c/o HUD to withdraw motion for extension of time to file answer #5 , motion to reassign case #4 (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Michael Joseph Kelly for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #5 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/20/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Counter Defendant United States of America c/o HUD for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal #1 (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Counter Defendant United States of America c/o HUD to reassign case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Michael Joseph Kelly as U.S. Attorney for Counter Defendant United States of America c/o HUD (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (17 CH 15440) filed by United States of America c/o HUD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Filing)(Kelly, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
