Jones v. Marquette Management, Inc.
DEMARRET JONES |
Marquette Management, Inc. |
1:2018cv07426 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert W Gettleman |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Jeffrey Scott Piell for presentment of motion for protective order #11 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 1/9/2019 at 09:15 AM. (Piell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Marquette Management, Inc. for protective order AGREED (Piell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Motion hearing held on 12/12/2018. Defendant's #6 amended joint motion to stay proceedings and toll the statute of limitations is granted. Status hearing set for 3/14/2019 at 9:00 a.m. This case is stayed until the 3/14/2019 hearing. Attorney Josh Sanford's motion #8 for leave to appear pro hac vice is granted. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Jason T. Brown for presentment of motion to appear pro hac vice #8 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 12/12/2018 at 09:15 AM. (Brown, Jason) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15257309. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Jeffrey Scott Piell for presentment of motion to amend/correct #6 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 12/12/2018 at 09:15 AM. (Piell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Marquette Management, Inc. to amend/correct Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Toll Statute Limitations JOINT (Piell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 ENTERED in Error. (Piell, Jeffrey) Modified on 12/11/2018 (smm, ). |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Marquette Management, Inc. by Jeffrey Scott Piell (Piell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Demarret Jones as to Marquette Management, Inc. on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (Brown, Jason) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DEMARRET JONES by Jason T. Brown (Brown, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by DEMARRET JONES; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15162120. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Jason) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Marquette Management, Inc. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Marquette Management, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DEMARRET JONES | |
Represented By: | Jason T. Brown |
Represented By: | Joshua Jon Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Marquette Management, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Scott Piell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.