Griffith v. H&R Block Inc et al
Plaintiff: Colleen Griffith
Defendant: H&R Block Tax Services, LLC and H&R Block Inc
Case Number: 1:2018cv07520
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Referring Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE by Daniel Evan Rubenstein of Change of Address of the Radice Law Firm (Rubenstein, Daniel)
December 17, 2018 Filing 15 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER - AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED 12/13/18 re: MDL No. 2880 signed by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
December 12, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15270339. (Shehadi, Paul)
December 10, 2018 Filing 13 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr for all further proceedings Pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/10/18. (aee, )
December 6, 2018 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for extension of time #7 is granted. Mailed notice (ewf, )
December 5, 2018 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants H&R Block Inc, H&R Block Tax Services, LLC by Uriel B. Abt (Abt, Uriel)
December 5, 2018 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants H&R Block Inc, H&R Block Tax Services, LLC by Timothy A. Hudson (Hudson, Timothy)
December 5, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15245955. (Gilman, Stacey)
December 4, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Michael I. Rothstein for presentment of extension of time #7 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/12/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Rothstein, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendants H&R Block Inc, H&R Block Tax Services, LLC for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiffs Class Action Complaint (Rothstein, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants H&R Block Inc, H&R Block Tax Services, LLC by Michael I. Rothstein (Rothstein, Michael)
November 27, 2018 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 2/8/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) report re MIDP due 2/5/2019. The report must comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg)
November 14, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Colleen Griffith by Kenneth A. Wexler (Wexler, Kenneth)
November 13, 2018 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Colleen Griffith by Mark Richard Miller (Miller, Mark)
November 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Colleen Griffith; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15174375. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Mark)
November 13, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm)
November 13, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants H&R Block Inc, H&R Block Tax Services, LLC (yt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffith v. H&R Block Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H&R Block Tax Services, LLC
Represented By: Uriel B. Abt
Represented By: Stacey R. Gilman
Represented By: Michael I. Rothstein
Represented By: Timothy A. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H&R Block Inc
Represented By: Uriel B. Abt
Represented By: Stacey R. Gilman
Represented By: Michael I. Rothstein
Represented By: Timothy A. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colleen Griffith
Represented By: Mark Richard Miller
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Represented By: Paul VIncent Shehadi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?