Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.210.189.59
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.210.189.59
Case Number: 1:2018cv07540
Filed: November 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court previously allowed plaintiff's counsel to proceed with expedited discovery and issue subpoena(s) to determine the identity of the Doe defendant #12 . In the meantime, plaintiff's Doe complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a proper amended complaint which expressly names the defendant. All discovery and third party subpoenas must be complied with even though the pending complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing previously set for 1/9/19 is stricken. This case is dismissed for administrative purposes. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference #8 is granted. Motion hearing date of 12/20/18 is stricken. Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause to conduct early discovery, in order to identify the defendants in this case. Plaintiff may issue Rule 45 subpoenas to the internet service providers associated with the defendants' IP addresses to obtain the names and addresses of the subscribers, and Plaintiff may use the information solely for purposes of this litigation. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re memorandum in support of motion, #10 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc)
December 10, 2018 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC in support of motion for leave to file #8 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Smith, Marc)
December 10, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Marc Craig Smith for presentment of motion for leave to file #8 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/20/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Smith, Marc)
December 10, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC for leave to file MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Smith, Marc)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 1/9/19 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
November 16, 2018 Filing 6 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (Attachments: #1 Copyright numbers) (aee, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, )
November 14, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re attorney appearance #3 , complaint #1 , civil cover sheet #2 NOTICE OF FILING FRCP 7.1 AND LR 3.2 DISCLOSURE (Smith, Marc)
November 14, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC by Marc Craig Smith ATTORNEY APPEARANCE (Smith, Marc)
November 14, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Marc)
November 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT-ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15177811. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Marc)
November 14, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.210.189.59
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.210.189.59
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Marc Craig Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?