McCambridge v. Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc.
| Megan McCambridge |
| Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07645 |
| November 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to the joint notice of settlement #13 , this case is dismissed without prejudice for 45 days. If no motion to reinstate is filed by 3/1/2019, the dismissal shall automatically convert to one with prejudice with no further action by the court. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 13 Joint Notice of Settlement STATEMENT by Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. (O'Conner, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. by Douglas R Sargent (Sargent, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The defendant's agreed motion for extension of time #9 is granted. The defendant's responsive pleading is due by 1/9/2019. No appearance necessary on 12/12/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas D. O'Conner for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/12/2018 at 08:45 AM. (O'Conner, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. for extension of time (O'Conner, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. by Nicholas D. O'Conner (O'Conner, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Megan McCambridge as to Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (Bach, Penelope) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are reminded that responsive pleadings must comply with section A(3) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. Status hearing set for 1/18/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. In the event that the defendant files a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the defendant is granted leave to notice that motion for presentment at the date and time of the status hearing. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. (yt) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Megan McCambridge by Paul Mathew Bach (Bach, Paul) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Megan McCambridge by Penelope Noami Bach (Bach, Penelope) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bach, Penelope) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Megan McCambridge; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15197706. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bach, Penelope) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCambridge v. Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. O'Conner |
| Represented By: | Douglas R Sargent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Megan McCambridge | |
| Represented By: | Paul Mathew Bach |
| Represented By: | Penelope Noami Bach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
