Hernandez et al v. City of Chicago et al
Charles Termini and Hector Hernandez |
Kevin Martin, City of Chicago, William Helm, Jamie Rhee and Joseph Alesia |
1:2018cv07647 |
November 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE Certification by Atty Re: Discovery Obligations (MIDP) (Scatchell, Gianna) |
Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Hector Hernandez, Charles Termini against All Defendants (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their complaint 19 is stricken as moot. Because Defendants have not yet filed their answer, Plaintiffs may amend their complaint as a matter of course pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 11 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Cass Thomas Casper for presentment of motion to supplement #9 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/10/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Cass Thomas Casper for presentment of motion to supplement #9 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/10/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiffs Hector Hernandez, Charles Termini to supplement Complaint at Law pursuant to FRCP 15(d) (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Casper, Cass) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Hector Hernandez, Charles Termini. All Defendants. (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Hector Hernandez, Charles Termini by Gianna Rochelle Scatchell (Scatchell, Gianna) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE By Plaintiff's Attorney Cass T. Casper Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Casper, Cass) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Joseph Alesia, City of Chicago, William Helm, Kevin Martin, Jamie Rhee (mc, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 1/23/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (tt, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Hector Hernandez, Charles Termini by Cass Thomas Casper (Casper, Cass) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hector Hernandez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15191128.(Casper, Cass) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.