Martinez v. Quick Delivery Service, Inc. et al
| David Martinez |
| Randall Seiler and Quick Delivery Service, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07651 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #12 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading is due by 1/25/19. The Court strikes the status date set for 1/24/19 and resets it to 1/30/19 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Brett H. Pyrdek for presentment of extension of time #12 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 1/15/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Pyrdek, Brett) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Quick Delivery Service, Inc., Randall Seiler for extension of time (Pyrdek, Brett) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Quick Delivery Service, Inc. (Pyrdek, Brett) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Quick Delivery Service, Inc., Randall Seiler by Brett H. Pyrdek (Pyrdek, Brett) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Martinez as to Randall Seiler on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Wilmes, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Martinez as to Quick Delivery Service, Inc. on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Wilmes, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ew, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 1/24/2019 at 1:30 PM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 1/17/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by David Martinez re complaint #1 additional exhibits to Class and Collective Action Complaint (Wilmes, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David Martinez by Matthew J. Piers (Piers, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David Martinez by Christopher J Wilmes (Wilmes, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wilmes, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class and Collective Action Complaint filed by David Martinez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15192351. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - FLSA Consent Form)(Wilmes, Christopher) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Quick Delivery Service, Inc., Randall Seiler (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
