Roberts v. United States Postal Service et al
| Judy M Roberts |
| Mary Wallace, Glenn Rupp, Lidia Lahey, United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan, Noreen Ribbs, Eric Goracio, Marvin Benemerito, Mary Tomei, Julia Doggett, John, Linnea Rosing-Doyle, Natalie Moffett, Fujita Kinjl and Bridget Boseak |
| 1:2018cv07655 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Judy M Roberts for reconsideration. (Exhibit) (pk, ) |
| Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice(gel, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On 11/19/18, Plaintiff submitted a pro se complaint #1 , along with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 , and a motion for attorney representation #5 . Plaintiff's complaint alleges that her employer discriminated against her on or about, or beginning on or about, 11/7/15. See #1 , 6. She further alleges that she filed a complaint of employment discrimination and received a final agency decision on 4/22/18. See #1 , 7.2(b). Absent equitable tolling, a Title VII suit against the federal government must be filed within 90 days of the Plaintiff's actual receipt of a final agency decision. 42 U.S.C. 2000e16(c); 29 C.F.R. 1614.407; Elmore v. Henderson, 227 F.3d 1009, 101011 (7th Cir. 2000). Although Plaintiff did not attach a copy of the final agency decision to her complaint, her allegations concerning the issuance of the final agency decision show that she initiated this lawsuit almost four months too late. And nothing in her complaint suggests that equitable tolling would apply. As a result, her claim is timebarred, and this case is dismissed. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 and her motion for attorney representation #5 are denied. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Judy M Roberts for attorney representation (pk, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Judy M Roberts for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit) (pk, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Judy M Roberts (pk, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pk, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 17 copies by Judy M Roberts. (Exhibit) (pk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
