SALEM v. EGAN
M JAMES SALEM |
DIANE EGAN |
1:2018cv07708 |
November 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ruben Castillo |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: Motion hearing held on 1/16/2019. Defendant's motion to vacate the default and extend time to file an answer or otherwise plead #10 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint by 2/6/2019. Defendant's motion to transfer case #13 is denied. (rao, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER : The Clerk of Court is directed to seal the following documents: Defendant's motion #10 ; Memorandum in Support #11 ; Defendant's motion to transfer #13 ; and Memorandum in Support #14 . Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/7/2019. Mailed notice. (ek, ) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by M James Salem in Opposition to motion to set aside judgment, motion to vacate #10 or in the alternative, that an evidentiary hearing be held to determine whether the default was intentional, whether there was good cause for the delay or whether there is a meritorious defense (Salem, M.) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Deadra Woods Stokes for presentment of motion to transfer case #13 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/16/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Diane Egan in support of motion to transfer case #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Diane Egan to transfer case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Deadra Woods Stokes for presentment of motion to set aside judgment, motion to vacate #10 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/16/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Diane Egan in support of motion to set aside judgment, motion to vacate #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Diane Egan to set aside judgment , MOTION by Defendant Diane Egan to vacate (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Diane Egan)(Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Diane Egan by Deadra Woods Stokes (Stokes, Deadra) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo:Plaintiff's motion for entry of default #6 is granted. The Court hereby enters a default against defendant Diane Egan for failure to timely appear, answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint. The motion hearing set for 12/26/2018 is stricken. Defendant is given until 1/2/2019 to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint and move to vacate this default. If defendant takes no action, then plaintiff is free to notice up a motion for a default judgment including compensatory and punitive damages. (rao, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by M. James Salem for presentment of motion for default judgment #6 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 12/26/2018 at 09:45 AM. (Salem, M.) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff M James Salem for default judgment as to Defendant Diane Egan (Attachments: #1 Executed Summons)(Salem, M.) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by M James Salem as to Diane Egan on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (Salem, M.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Diane Egan (yt) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff M JAMES SALEM by M. James Salem (Salem, M.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Salem, M.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by M JAMES SALEM; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15197849.(Salem, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SALEM v. EGAN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: M JAMES SALEM | |
Represented By: | M. James Salem |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DIANE EGAN | |
Represented By: | Deadra Woods Stokes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.