Juul Labs, Inc. v. Fuma Vapor, Inc.
| Juul Labs, Inc. |
| Fuma Vapor, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07711 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The status hearing set for 1/22/2019 is stricken and reset for 2/11/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are to file a joint status report by 2/6/2019 in the format described on the Court's website. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juul Labs, Inc. as to Fuma Vapor, Inc. on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. (Stack, Paul) |
| Filing 7 STATUS Report by Juul Labs, Inc. (Stack, Paul) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Status hearing set for 1/22/2019 at 9:00 AM. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report by 1/16/2019 in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The court encourages the parties to review this court'swebsite for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Fuma Vapor, Inc. (mc, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (kp, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc. by Paul F. Stack (Stack, Paul) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc. by Paul F. Stack (Stack, Paul) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Stack, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Juul Labs, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15198185. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16)(Stack, Paul) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Juul Labs, Inc. v. Fuma Vapor, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fuma Vapor, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juul Labs, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Paul F. Stack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
