Juul Labs, Inc. v. Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc.
Juul Labs, Inc. |
Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc. |
1:2018cv07724 |
November 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Gary Feinerman |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: By agreement #8 , this case is stayed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659(a) pending resolution of parallel proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. The 1/7/2019 status hearing #5 is stricken and re-set to 7/15/2019 at 9:00 a.m. By 7/8/2019, the parties shall file a status report regarding the ITC proceedings. Because the stay is of indeterminate duration, this case is closed for administrative reporting purposes and will be administratively reopened if and when the stay is lifted. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Action (Kocoras, Peter) |
Filing 7 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc. (Kocoras, Peter) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc. by Peter John Kocoras (Kocoras, Peter) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Initial status hearing set for 1/7/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 1/3/2019. Please see Judge Feinerman's web page (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, to "District Judges," to "Judge Gary Feinerman," to "Initial Status Hearings" under Case Management Procedures) for details on the initial status hearing and Initial Status Report. In completing the initial status report, please see Appendix (A) to the Local Patent Rules for details on preparing the Initial Report.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc. by Paul F. Stack (Stack, Paul) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Stack, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Juul Labs, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15200762. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Stack, Paul) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Juul Labs, Inc. v. Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vapor 4 Life Holdings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Peter John Kocoras |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Juul Labs, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Paul F. Stack |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.