Wolfe v. Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, LLC et al
| Anthony Wolfe |
| Michele Ann Conner, Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, LLC and Mischa Conner |
| 1:2018cv07749 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Initial status hearing set for 1/23/2019 at 09:00 AM, courtroom 2141. Mailed notice. (etv, ) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Anthony Wolfe. Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, LLC waiver sent on 11/26/2018, answer due 1/25/2019. (Blaise, Heather) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anthony Wolfe by Heather Lea Blaise (Blaise, Heather) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blaise, Heather) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony Wolfe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15203540. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - File Detail Report, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - May 28, 2018 Letter, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Notice of Right to Sue)(Blaise, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
