Dillard v. Lashbrook
Jerrel Dillard |
Illinois Department Of Corrections, State of Illinois and Jacqueline Lashbrook |
1:2018cv07780 |
November 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles R Norgle |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FILED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jerrel Dillard (bg, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, #3 is denied. Petitioner is ordered to pay the $5.00 statutory filing fee by 1-7-19. Failure to comply with this order may result in summary dismissal of this case. Petitioner's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied as premature. The Clerk is instructed to: (1) terminate Respondents State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections; and, (2) update the docket to reflect that Respondent is Jacqueline Lashbrook, Warden, Menard Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 12/18/2018. Mailed notice. (bg, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of filing by Jerrel Dillard (bg, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Petitioner Jerrel Dillard for attorney representation (bg, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Jerrel Dillard for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibit) (bg, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Jerrel Dillard (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.