Sims v. Warehouse Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Whitney Sims
Defendant: Warehouse Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv07804
Filed: November 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Warehouse Services, Inc.(Mcanulty, Mark)
January 18, 2019 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Michael Kim Chropowicz (Chropowicz, Michael)
January 18, 2019 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Jon Eric Klinghoffer (Klinghoffer, Jon)
January 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Warehouse Services, Inc. (Mcanulty, Mark)
January 18, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Mark Alan Mcanulty (Mcanulty, Mark)
January 11, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 2/19/2019. The Court will hold a status hearing in open court on 2/26/2019 at 9:45 a.m. (rao, )
November 28, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lf, )
November 27, 2018 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Whitney Sims by Mason Scott Cole (Cole, Mason)
November 27, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cole, Mason)
November 27, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cole, Mason)
November 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Whitney Sims; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15212689.(Cole, Mason)
November 27, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, )
November 27, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. (rc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. Warehouse Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warehouse Services, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Kim Chropowicz
Represented By: Jon Eric Klinghoffer
Represented By: Mark Alan Mcanulty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Whitney Sims
Represented By: Mason Scott Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?