Sims v. Warehouse Services, Inc.
Whitney Sims |
Warehouse Services, Inc. |
1:2018cv07804 |
November 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ruben Castillo |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Warehouse Services, Inc.(Mcanulty, Mark) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Michael Kim Chropowicz (Chropowicz, Michael) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Jon Eric Klinghoffer (Klinghoffer, Jon) |
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Warehouse Services, Inc. (Mcanulty, Mark) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. by Mark Alan Mcanulty (Mcanulty, Mark) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 2/19/2019. The Court will hold a status hearing in open court on 2/26/2019 at 9:45 a.m. (rao, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lf, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Whitney Sims by Mason Scott Cole (Cole, Mason) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cole, Mason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cole, Mason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Whitney Sims; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15212689.(Cole, Mason) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Warehouse Services, Inc. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sims v. Warehouse Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Warehouse Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael Kim Chropowicz |
Represented By: | Jon Eric Klinghoffer |
Represented By: | Mark Alan Mcanulty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Whitney Sims | |
Represented By: | Mason Scott Cole |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.