Stennis v. Armstrong et al
| Territa Stennis |
| UNITED STATES, Amina Sathout, William Armstrong, Gary Marsh and The United States of America |
| 1:2018cv07846 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DESIGNATION of Gina Elizabeth Brock as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Armstrong, Gary Marsh, Amina Sathout, The United States of America (Brock, Gina)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED GENERAL ORDER 18-0028 dated 01/08/2019: On December 26, 2018, General Order 18-0028 was entered. It appearing that the lapse of congressional appropriations funding the federal government continues, therefore General Order 18-0028 is now amended. (For Further Details See Attached Order). Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/8/2019: Mailed notice. (sm, )
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, )
|
|
Filing 6
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that further judicial action is required in 18 CV 7846, Stennis v. Armstrong et al., which is assigned to the Hon. Charles P. Kocoras, who is not receiving civil cases where the United States of America is a party; therefore It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of Court is to reassign by lot 18 CV 7846, Stennis v. Armstrong et al., to another district court judge of this Court. Case reassigned to the Honorable Manish S. Shah for all further proceedings. Honorable Charles P. Kocoras no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/3/2019.(pk, )
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER 18-0028 dated 12/26/18: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, effective December 26, 2018, that all civil litigation involving as a party the United States of America, is immediately suspended, postponed and held in abeyance continuing for a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this General Order (For Further Details See Attached Order). Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 12/26/2018: Mailed notice. (sm, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Gary Marsh, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (pj, )
|
|
Filing 4
FIRST AMENDED complaint by Territa Stennis against All Defendants (Randolph, Justin)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Territa Stennis by Justin Giles Randolph (Randolph, Justin)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Randolph, Justin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Territa Stennis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15221163.(Randolph, Justin)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
