Taylor v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al
| Trudy Taylor |
| Gerald Beimler, Brian Ali, Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Local School Council for Aldridge Elementary School, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Ryan Crosby, Ronald Marmer, Elizabeth Kirby, Karen Saffold, Local School Council for Jesse Owens Elementary Community Academy, Forrest Claypool, Thomas Krieger, Felicia Sanders, Janice Jackson, State of Illinois and James Ciesil |
| 1:2018cv07874 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Sixth AMENDED complaint by Trudy Taylor against Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Karen Saffold (Onyango, Eric) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Trudy Taylor by Maudia Diana Victorian Norman Washington (Norman Washington, Maudia) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Elizabeth Kathleen Barton (Barton, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Status hearing held on 12/17/2018. Amended complaint to be filed by 1/24/2019. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due by 1/24/2019. Answer to amended complaint to be filed by 2/21/2019. Status hearing is set for 2/5/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (pjg, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Defendants' motion for clarification and extension of time #5 is terminated as moot based on the Court's rulings at today's status hearing. (mk) |
| Filing 8 REPLY by Defendants Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Karen Saffold to motion to clarify, motion for extension of time to file answer #5 (Jaremus, Christina) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Trudy Taylor to motion to clarify, motion for extension of time to file answer #5 (Onyango, Eric) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Susan Jane Best for presentment of motion to clarify, motion for extension of time to file answer #5 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/18/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Best, Susan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendants Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Karen Saffold to clarify , MOTION by Defendants Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Karen Saffold for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) (Best, Susan) |
| Filing 4 STATUS Report JOINT by Board of Education of the City of Chicago (Best, Susan) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: This case having been severed from Case No. 16-cv-8668 and having been reassigned to Judge Kennelly, a status hearing is set for 12/17/2018 at 9:30 AM. By no later than 12/12/2018, the parties are to file a joint status report giving a brief summary of each claim and defense; describing the status of discovery, including what discovery has been done and what exactly remains to be done; and discussing the history and status of any discussions regarding settlement. (mk) |
| Filing 2 FIFTH AMENDED complaint by Trudy Taylor against Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Karen Saffold and Scholastic, Inc. (kp, ) |
Filing 1
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/28/2018. Mailed notice. (kp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
